8 Responses to "You Seem More Disfluent Today"

2 questions:
1- You say: ‘The real question is: would I be OK if someone I did not know quite so well had commented and asked the same question’ …has this happened to you? I would think that if someone didn’t know you very well, that they might not be able to *tell* if you were more ‘stuttery’ (haha…love that term!), in which case, if they *did* comment, I wouldn’t put much stock in it, because what the heck do they know anyway?? I’m curious to hear about real experiences with this.
2- Could there be such thing as a ‘relative expert’?


Hi Pam-
This was very thought provoking. What do initials or titles really mean? I am not downplaying my masters degree or years of experience at all but some people do have the unique ability to transform their life experiences and help others. I do think you are unique in the sense that you are sensitive to how others feel. You are special in that you have shared your experiences with others without judgement. Words are a matter of semantics. What is important is that your knowledge has helped so many others. Because of your easy manner I am comfortable talking on the radio. I guess that makes you an expert as no one else was able to get me over that hump. Lori


Education alone can’t make an expert (the same with reading books and visiting lectures – they can stay as others’ experience as long as they are capable of), one needs personal experience, good and bad one.
You are a stammerer, plus you were a covert one (additional experience); you have met and talked to stammering people and made them “open up”; you have a degree in social work; you DID social work, you have experience in consulting at school level (it’s a job in communication, and stammering is sometimes called a communication disorder (I don’t claim it is)). So you are an expert 🙂
You don’t have to be an SLP, and not every SLP is an expert in stuttering. The same with Master’s. And you definitely don’t need a PhD to be an expert; PhD attests your abilities to do research – grasp theories, collect data, analyze it (using qualitative and quantitative methods, at best) etc. and have basic teaching skills at university level. Lots of people in academia don’t possess good communication skills; the fun’s not always transparent 🙂 (“Now, that we have socialized (10 min. coffee break with sweets and talking about ‘insignificant’ stuff as cars, Cold War and family issues), let’s get back to the lab!”).
And communication is meant to connect people, not to deliver information (by writing articles, books, …) or to disconnect them (by criticism – which is important for doing research). For example, I wrote this post for 5 days (editing, considering words, phrasing …), and in everyday communication nobody would wait for me that long (I don’t consider myself good at communication and I don’t mind it).

February 8, 2011 at 7:46 AM
As an “expert” in the field I would absolutely positively say that you are far more of an expert than I am. Only through personal experience and education (formally, informally, however) can a person call themselves an expert. And you should totally go to school to be an SLP – I can’t even begin to think of what an incredible asset you would be to our field!
February 8, 2011 at 8:31 AM
Thanks Sara! That really is validating!
But since grad school is not free, doesn’t look probable! 🙂