12 Responses to "What Stuttering Looks Like"

Very interesting viewpoint. Do you know what: it reminded me this famous sentence that the silence after Mozart is still by Mozart…


Hi Pam
Very interesting idea to actually look at stuttering or the dead air parts of it anyway.
I did a radio broadcast last year on Louis Braille. The producer said I needed to sound more natural, more like me, so I did that and stuttered a bit more than when I was reading slower and more deliberately. She said they could edit out the stuttering, and I said I wanted her to leave them in because that’s how I sound. Like you, I felt a bit offended that the stuttering wasn’t considered ok, while the sound of my fingers reading my braille script was. They didn’t want to edit my fingers brushing across the braille out, but the stuttering was unacceptable. So they edited the stutters out and I had no control over it. If you listen to that programme http://www.radionz.co.nz/concert and search for braille, you will hear the tiniest of stutters but most people would never know. I’m trying to hide my stutter less but the world wants to hide it because it thinks it’s unacceptable. Being a user of one of those services for the visually impaired, I can see where the woman was coming from. They want clean sounding audio which is easy to listen to, but for us who stutter, the dead air is part of how we talk and it’s not dead air. Anyway sorry this is so long but it struck a chord with me.


Hi Pam,
I was thinking as I read your post that people do similar “editing” in other contexts, like dyeing their hair, or using contact lenses, or using elevated shoes. Of course, people ususally “edit” themsleves these ways as a matter of personal choice and not as a result of coercion. (At least, its not outward coercion, but rather inward coercion — a need to fit socety’s “mold”.)
In your context, the producer said she wanted you to sound “natural”, but after 6 times it became obvious to you that what she really wanted was for you to sound natural in the world’s mold, and not sound like the natural “you”. In your context, “editing out” the stutters from the audio clip would have been edititng out “you”.
On the other hand, I think you’d agree that just like there might be a time and place where hair dye, contact lenses, elelvated shoes, etc., could be useful. so too there might be be a time and place where the audio editing editing program could be useful to you — it just has to be YOUR decision, not somebody elses.


Funny, but I have to read this from the perspective of my ‘speech impediment’. While you may stutter, your diction, grammar, prounciation, sentence structure – all means of verbal speech – are otherwise strong. And when I hear your speak I rarely notice your stuttering because of those other strong speaking qualities. Yet for me, while I do not stutter, I am bothered and self conscious of my inner-city speech patterns – i.e., speaking very quickly, losing the end of words and often sentences, hard ‘r’s – not to mention the often, unplanned use of ‘colorful words’.
Rather than rolling with my speaking issues and being proud of my background, it has become a disincentive to speak in public. Perhaps I should ‘roll with it’. What did you say at the end: So be it, right?


This is an interesting way of viewing it. Technology is incredible. Thanks for sharing it.


Hi Pam,
Thank you for the opportunity to review this piece. I am a visual learner so I’m fascinated by Audacity software. The different lines actually represent your voice and the lines with little depth capture stuttering. Amazing technology!
It’s been an honor to witness your “growth” in Toastmasters. You’ve certainly demonstrated an ability to be true to yourself. In my opinion, being true to ourself is one of the most valued traits of the human spirit.
Way to go Stutterrockstar!!

June 16, 2010 at 10:44 AM
YES, you are right!